Matt ignored his own past advice about college being a waste of time and money for most professions by basing his "value" of jobs on how much education and training is needed to perform a job. The more education, the more valuable the job is, which is doubly ironic since Matt consistently dismisses the idea that college is necessary and since he never actually graduated from college himself.
I don't know what Matt wants, but it certainly isn't justice. I’d like to believe he’s smart enough to deduce that the lukewarm way this case was handled by the prosecution made a just outcome impossible. After his hypocritical and morally backwards diatribe against rioting, as well as his pathetically ignorant indictment of the black community for what he perceives to be its shortcomings, I can only assume that Matt will bend any fact scenario until it makes him feel right. After all, if he’s right he gets to be Captain Correct Conservative Christian Crusader (copyright pending).
If Matt took the time to visit a Gender Studies department — despite the clear risk that he might melt like Dracula exposed to sunlight — or if he bothered to talk to historians or sociologists specializing in gender issues, he would find that most thoughtful self-described feminists see institutionalized gender as something that can hurt men too. There's a very good reason why more academic departments are being named “Gender Studies” departments instead of “Women's Studies”.
Usually the trouble with describing how Matt Walsh is wrong is figuring out how to debunk his argument without simply blaming his wrongness on the parfait of logical fallacies that he seems to be so fond of. Luckily, that’s not an issue here because Matt doesn't actually present much of a coherent argument, though, per the norm, he does engage in a number of fallacies.
Most of us don’t care that much that gay marriages be considered equal in terms of the moral perspectives of specific individuals, churches, or groups. If you want to say that your marriage is better than a gay marriage, by all means go ahead. What advocates of gay marriage are seeking is equal protection under the law for same-sex couples. That’s what we call marriage equality, and I think you ignore that because it hurts your argument.
Imagine being subjected to some seemingly small form of prejudice or micro-aggression every day of your life. Imagine not being able to escape it. Imagine being told that when you experience these things that you "need to get a thicker skin", "stop being so sensitive", or "learn to take a joke", which are all things Matt says. Some, if not most, of the people Matt is passing judgement on have been tortured with these micro-aggressions for a long time, and some are at the point where each one sets something off. Doubtless, there are people in this country who are too sensitive or get offended too often, but for the rest of us, micro-aggressions are a very real thing, and not the product of desiring pity or being bored.
For thoughtful people, the reason why male assaults on females deserve our particular attention is because there is a sad history of those in power — which for most of history has meant men — abusing those who don't have the same amount of power — which for most of history has meant women. It's the same reason that the public is so outraged by the recent Ferguson shooting. Other similar situations that involved a white victim are equally awful. But, we cannot ignore history, and there has been a long, horrible, and continuing history of oppression, discrimination, and brutality directed from white people toward black people, and the knowledge of that history colors the present.
The problem with Walsh isn’t that there’s so much he doesn’t understand. The problem is that he is incredibly unaware of how much he doesn’t understand. He doesn’t want to understand. He doesn’t want to understand you; he wants you to be more like him. One gets the feeling that if asked to walk a mile in someone’s shoes, Walsh would literally take said person’s shoes, put them on, and walk for exactly one mile. “There,” he might say, “Now do you see that you should just ____?“